Florida 2008 Legislation Archive
Calls Needed to Move Florida Legislation Time is running short! The Florida House is considering six bills to address illegal immigration. The bills were dead but concerned citizens put pressure on Speaker Rubio to have a first hearing (State Affairs workshop) on the bills which was held Tuesday, April 8, 2008. At this time there has been no notification of any hearing by the House Govt Efficiency & Accountability Council, the next step after the State Affairs Hearing. We must now demand the hearing where the elements of six bills will be combined into a Proposed Council Bill (PCB). Now the House leadership is blaming the Senate for inaction so calls are needed to Senators as well. PLEASE CALL DAILY TO ASK THE HOUSE GOVT EFFICIENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY COUNCIL TO SCHEDULE A HEARING ON THE SIX ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION BILLS: Rep. Marco Rubio, Speaker of the House, (850) 488-1450, (305) 442-6939 Rep. Frank Attkisson, Chair Government Efficiency & Accountability Council, (850) 488-8992, (407) 943-3077 Rep. David Rivera, Chair Rules & Calendar , (850) 488-7897, (305) 227-7630, (239) 434-5094 Rep. Adam Hasner, Majority Leader, (850) 488-2234, (561) 279-1616 PLEASE CALL DAILY TO ASK THE SENATE TO SCHEDULE HEARINGS ON ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION BILLS SB 540 AND SB 388:
Two relevant articles on a recent cost study are:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is outrageous that the 2008 Legislature, so far, plans budget cuts to penalize citizens leaving illegal aliens unscathed but the Legislature may even reduce the penalties to illegal aliens who drive unlicensed!!
A BIG THANKS to the about 30 activists from across Florida who attended the State Affairs Workshop on April 8, 2008. Their willingness to spend the time and money to attend shows their grave concern about this issue. Although inadequate time was allocated to speakers, the presentations were accurate, well done and on issue. State Affair committee members and others were given Florida's Illegal Immigration Crisis document which is a two inch thick compilation of the costs and detrimental impacts of illegal immigration upon Floridians. You can view the nearly three hour video of the State Affairs Committee Hearing if you have broadband. The first 1 hour 17 minutes can be skipped as it is primarily Florida agencies describing their role in the issue. The later portion includes speakers from both sides as well as the "anti-Hispanic" allegation from Rep. Zapata and a defense of illegal immigration by Rep. Rivera. An analysis by a concerned Floridian is available. In addition to bill sponsors Brown, Adams, Kravitz, Williams, Gilbert and Harrell, other supportive comments can be viewed from the video at:
The most telling testimony was that of Rep. Rivera who is a personal friend of Speaker Rubio and Chairman of the powerful Rules Committee. Although not a member of the State Affairs committee, Rep. Rivera was allowed to speak as is often allowed. One can safely assume that Rep. Rivera testified at the behest of Speaker Rubio. Rep. Rivera made a number of ridiculous statements in defense of illegal immigration including an inaccurate contention about the taxes paid by illegal aliens. Illegal aliens may pay consumptive taxes but it is income taxes that are substantially not paid. Of course, he failed to mention costs. The point is that Rep. Rivera's defense of illegal immigration is a strong signal that Speaker Rubio holds the same position. Statements of Elected Officials:
Videos:
Links to newspaper coverage of the State Affairs Hearing:
April 17, 2008 |
||||||||
Proponents of illegal immigration April 7, 2008 |
||||||||
April 3, 2008 |
||||||||
|
||||||||
April 18, 2008 |
||||||||
March 14, 2008 |
||||||||
April 16, 2008
Amendment 1 on the Florida ballot for the General
Election on November 4, 2008 asks voters whether or
not to remove a clause from the Florida Constitution
dealing with property ownership by "aliens ineligible
for citizenship." The ballot question
needs 60 percent approval for passage.
Quick Voter
Guide on Amendment 1 If you
like political correctness and don't have
concerns about sovereignty Yes If you
dislike political correctness and do have
concerns about sovereignty FLIMEN
recommends a NO vote on Amendment 1.
FLIMEN believes the
Amendment 1 is essentially an exercise in political
correctness and there are reasons to keep the clause
in the Constitution even though the power has not yet
been used. FLIMEN has
found the following points to be salient: The
driving forces for Amendment 1 are the
Organization of
Chinese-Americans, Democrats and newspaper
writers. Although
the "vestiges" of the alien land law may have been
racially motivated, there has not been proof that the
law per se is racist. The clause "aliens
ineligible for citizenship" is not racially
discriminatory and the case law referenced by the
proponents may not be relevant in new situations
brought about by globalization. As in so
much of the obsessive racist name-calling that
masquerades as a national debate on the
immigration/invasion issue the definition of
"racism is when you disagree with a liberal" seems to
be the common use definition in this ballot question as
well.
Florida Democrat Senator Geller,
the
ballot question sponsor,
might have a point
that the ballot question is "purely symbolic" except
that there are reasons to believe that the clause
potentially could be useful, if not damaging if
removed. The key to this
ballot question is not the history of the law but
realization of "aliens ineligible for citizenship."
Given that our bumbling, dysfunction federal
government has failed to secure our borders, is
failing to protect our assets from foreign ownership
and has failed to protect American workers from the illegal
invasion, it seems plausible that Florida might
someday
want the power
to restrict property ownership from those defined by
the list below.
Under current U.S. immigration law, aliens
ineligible for citizenship include aliens who:
Quotations from two prominent persons who oppose
Amendment 1 are provided.
1) Florida Republican Representative Dennis Ross who voted
against the bill to put the question to an election
contends the constitutional power potentially could
be useful.
http://www2.tbo.com/content/2008/aug/18/me-land-law-amendment-targetsvestigesofracism:
"In the
global environment we live in, when we see a lot
of foreign interests buying up property in the
United States, I think we should still have some
control," said Rep. Dennis Ross, R-Lakeland. "At
least now, we still have the ability to regulate
it." Ross
said there may be lawful, reasonable ways of
enforcing that provision against people who are
disqualified for citizenship today, such as
terrorists and human traffickers. "If
they're ineligible, that should be a red flag to
us that maybe we don't want them as property
owners in the state of Florida," said Ross, who
sits on the Safety and Security Council, which
heard the proposal in 2007. "Especially if we are
talking about homeland security and protecting
our interests." Even if
the origins of the alien land law are racist, he
said, that does not mean automatically that it
can serve no purpose now. A land purchase by
terrorists or other dangerous foreign interests
"could be masked as a very innocent group of
foreigners," he said.
2) Michael Hethmon, Director of
Immigration Reform Law
Institute (IRLI), offers the following
legal comments, calling the amendment "a very
serious attack on sovereignty."
I
think this is a very serious attack on
sovereignty and would have adverse implications
for immigration control if enacted.
Under
the amendment, the state would voluntarily
relinquish its sovereignty over land ownership.
The right of states to control ownership of land
by non-citizens has deep ancient roots in the
common law, and has repeatedly survived
challenges to its constitutionality.
The
implications of the amendment seem to be
sweeping. If an alien ineligible for
citizenship an illegal alien or a foreign
government proxy is given the unrestricted right
of land ownership, he will have acquired at least
a colorable claim to a wide range of fundamental
rights that are normally both in the US and
abroad associated with the rights and
privileges of citizenship. This is a big step
towards the globalist goal of replacing
citizenship as the legal criteria for membership
in US society with
denizenship
your rights come not from the social contract
with your fellow citizens, but from your control
of assets; in this case, land. Purchase of
housing by illegals is already a big problem, as
you know -- they comprise many of the problem
single-family tenements, as illegal aliens rent
out the rooms to make the mortgage, and then take
the mortgage interest deduction using their ITIN. Links:
http://election.dos.state.fl.us/initiatives/fulltext/pdf/10-69.pdf
(Text of the
ballot question)
http://www.tampabay.com/incoming/article821389.ece
http://www.local10.com/politics/17503127/detail.html
http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/Florida_Property_Rights_and_Ineligible_Aliens_(2008)
http://www.flsenate.gov/data/session/2007/Senate/bills/analysis/pdf/2007s0166.ju.pdf October 22, 2008
-----------------------------------------------------------
2008 Voter Guide Information
below provides information on candidates for the 2008
General Election on November 4, 2008. The two
sources are ALIPAC endorsements and NumbersUSA
assessments both of which grade the candidates on their
pro-enforcement immigration position.
ALIPAC Endorsements for Florida:
NumbersUSA - Florida
Congressional Races
NumbersUSA -
Presidential Candidates On Immigration Issues
NumbersUSA -
Congressional Immigration Reform Caucus Members Running
for Re-election:
October 21, 2008 |